Apple and Google teamed to offer more than $500 million to buy Kodak’s imaging patents, Bloomberg reported late last week.
With their two leading smartphone operating systems, iOS and Android, the two companies have dominant positions in mobile imaging, and doubtless would rather not face patent infringement claims from any potential rival buying Kodak’s intellectual property.
It’s not an uncommon move: Apple worked with Microsoft and Research in Motion to acquire 6,000 patents for $4.5 billion from bankrupt Nortel Networks last year.
Kodak, in the midst of bankruptcy and reorganization, seeks to sell 1,100 imaging patents.
Kodak has claimed the patents may be worth more than $2 billion, but others counter the patents are already too widely licensed to be of much further value.
___________________________________________________________________________























All photography is mobile
[Commentary] Today the Wall Street Journal confirmed Facebook is developing a phone of its own. And so the company that is by far the leading online site for photography — Facebook says its members upload more than 250 million photos each day — will extend from solely photo sharing to photo capture.
Meanwhile, a comprehensive review of the iPhone 4S camera shows its image quality is more than comparable to standalone cameras.
It’s often said in debate that the key to winning is framing the argument, and defining the terms.
And the telephone industry has somehow won the term “mobile imaging.”
Meaning the traditional camera industry is… what? Non-moving imaging? Couch-bound capture? Frozen-in-place photography?
Most of us take pictures when we leave our homes. Yes, there are some who — ahem — take photos from recliners of cats sleeping on desktops — but otherwise, we all take a picture when we have left our home, gone to a striking location, or are attending an event, visiting with people, or otherwise seeing something new… When we are out-and-about. In other words, mobile.
It’s not just a semantic distinction.
It’s emblematic of how the camera industry — despite doing admittedly well, year-to-year — lost the real photography mass market to phone makers and Facebook.
[Read more...]